CARLTON et al v. NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
| BRIAN CARLTON and MARGARET CARLTON |
| NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT, ROBERT WAYMAN and WESTMORELAND COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE |
| 2:2022cv00480 |
| March 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| W Scott Hardy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph W. Cavrich on behalf of NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Cavrich, Joseph) |
Filing 3
ORDER on Motions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). See attached Order for further details. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 03/23/2022. (dms)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE that the instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. The Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the Stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiffs (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendants) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dms) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NORWIN SCHOOL DISTRICT, ROBERT WAYMAN, WESTMORELAND COUNTY REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7012016), filed by BRIAN CARLTON, MARGARET CARLTON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lyk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
