GENOVESE v. MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC et al
| KELLY A. GENOVESE |
| MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC and MIDLAND FUNDING LLC |
| 2:2022cv00563 |
| April 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING the #8 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 06/15/2022. (jmb)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION of Dismissal by KELLY A. GENOVESE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Frank, Eugene) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of this action. Should further proceedings be required, either party may file a motion to re-open and this case will proceed as if this order had not been entered. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court expressly retains jurisdiction in this matter to consider any issue arising during the period when settlement is being finalized including, but not limited to, enforcing settlement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 05/06/2022. (jmb)
|
| Filing 6 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC, MIDLAND FUNDING LLC Answer due from All Defendants. (Vugrinovich, Danielle) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement identifying Encore Capital Group,Inc. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by MIDLAND FUNDING LLC. (Vugrinovich, Danielle) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement identifying Encore Capital Group, Inc. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC. (Vugrinovich, Danielle) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER that because this case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge, each party must execute and file the form consenting to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge or selecting the option to have the case randomly assigned to a District Judge no later than May 9, 2022. The applicable form is available on the Courts website at www.pawd.uscourts.gov in the forms section. THE EVENT USED FOR DOCKETING THIS FORM IS FOUND UNDER OTHER DOCUMENTS, CALLED CONSENT TO TRIAL BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE OR DISTRICT JUDGE. If the parties elect to have the case assigned to a District Judge, Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan will continue to manage the case as provided for in Local Rule 72G. Any party who has filed a Consent to Trial by a Magistrate Judge or District Judge form does not need to refile it. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 04/18/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form) (jmb)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 04/18/2022. (jmb)
|
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Notice of Removal,. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 4/22/2022. (jv) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number AR 22-000808 (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7055225), filed by MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC, MIDLAND FUNDING LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Including Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4) (jv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
