Damelio v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
Robert Damelio |
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC. |
2:2022cv00697 |
May 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Joy Flowers Conti |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
Set Hearings: A joint science day with the SoClean MDL is set for 9/1/2022 at 11:00 a.m. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (sms) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing 18 TOLLING AGREEMENT. (sms) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Florida Southern; Case Number 9:22-cv-80658. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 6 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-29) transferring case to the Western District of Pennsylvania re: MDL 3014 for consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 USC 1407 and assigned to the Honorable Joy Flowers Conti. (Signed by John W. Nichols, Clerk of the Panel). (pes) |
|
Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer to MDL No.3014, with Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Koninklijke Philips N.V., Philips North America, LLC, Philips RS North America, LLC. Attorney Courtney Michelle King added to party Koninklijke Philips N.V.(pty:dft). Responses due by 5/19/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Tag Along Notice, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - CTO 29, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Stay Orders, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Proposed Order Motion to Stay)(King, Courtney) |
Filing 3 Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Michael H. Steinberg, William B. Monahan and John P. Lavelle, Jr., mailing date April 28, 2022, (pt) |
Filing 2 Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge William Matthewman is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. (nan) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (STATE COURT COMPLAINT - Robert Damelio v Koninklijke Philips N.V.,; Philips North America, LLC; and Philips RS North America, LLC) Filing fee $ 402.00 receipt number AFLSDC-15596805, filed by Philips RS North America, LLC, Philips North America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Notice of Service of Process/State Court Summon(s) Philips North America LLC, #3 Notice of Service of Process/ State Court Summon(s) Philips RS North America LLC, #4 Exhibit Complaint, #5 Exhibit Notice of Service of Process, Philips North America LLC, #6 Exhibit Notice of Service of Process, Philips RS North America LLC, #7 Exhibit Philips RS North America LLC Corporate Records & Business Registrations, #8 Exhibit Philips RS North America Holding Corporation Corporate Records & Business Registrations, #9 Exhibit Philips North America LLC Corporate Records & Business Registrations, #10 Exhibit Philips Holding USA Inc. Corporate Records & Business Registrations, #11 Exhibit Transfer Order, No Answer/Motion to Dismiss filed.)(King, Courtney) Modified attachment description on 4/28/2022 (nan). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.