GRIFFIN et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
| MICHAEL GRIFFIN and SANDY GRIFFIN |
| HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. trading and doing business as THE HOME DEPOT trading and doing business as THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. trading and doing business as THE HOME DEPOT |
| 2:2022cv00739 |
| May 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., Clerk is remanded to Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, forthwith. Clerk to mark CASE CLOSED, and send certified copy of this order to Prothonotary. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/20/2022. (cw)
|
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying NONE as corporate parent or other affiliate, by HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.. (jd) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from ALLEGHENY COUNTY, case number GD-21-03056 with BOTH Copies attached: LOWER COURT COMPLAINT, EXHIBITS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7107613), filed by HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Certificate of Service, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
