PEPOCK v. ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC.
| DANIEL PEPOCK |
| ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. |
| 2:2022cv00981 |
| July 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Christy Criswell Wiegand |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING: In light of #9 Report of Mediation advising the Court that the case has been resolved, Clerk is to mark this CASE CLOSED, pending the parties filing a stipulation of dismissal. The parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal or joint status report regarding settlement on or before 9/23/2022. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all hearings and deadlines in this case, are cancelled. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court expressly retains jurisdiction in this matter to consider any issue arising during the period when settlement is being finalized, including, but not limited to, enforcing settlement. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 8/23/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmm)
|
| Filing 9 REPORT of Mediation: Case has been resolved. The parties are reminded of their obligation to complete the ADR questionnaire and submit within 5 days of the conclusion of the ADR process. The questionnaire can be accessed #here or at www.pawd.uscourts.gov. Click on the ADR icon. Mediation session was held on 8/22/2022. (Shepard, Mark) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING parties' #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. and ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. shall file an answer, or a responsive pleading, to Plaintiff's #6 Amended Complaint on or before 9/12/2022. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 7/22/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmm)
|
| Filing 7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. Answer due from ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. on 9/12/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wolff, Peter) |
| Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. on 7/29/2022 (keh) Modified to correct date on 7/18/2022 (keh). |
| Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. answer due 7/29/2022, filed by DANIEL PEPOCK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D) (Kerr, Lawrence) Modified to update date and remove duplicate text on 7/18/2022 (keh). |
| Filing 5 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only," so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jmm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 7/7/2022. (jmm)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jmm) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. (Wolff, Peter) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Notice of Removal. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 7/13/2022. (keh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Westmoreland County, case number 1882 of 2022 Copies attached: state court records (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7182173), filed by ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B) (keh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PEPOCK v. ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DANIEL PEPOCK | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence D. Kerr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Peter S. Wolff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
