PANDYA et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
Plaintiff: RAJUL PANDYA and NISHA KALIA
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and TERRI ROBINSON
Case Number: 2:2022cv01019
Filed: July 13, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: W Scott Hardy
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2022 Filing 5 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by RAJUL PANDYA, NISHA KALIA. UR MENDOZA JADDOU served on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022; TERRI ROBINSON served on 7/25/2022, answer due 9/23/2022; UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES served on 7/27/2022, answer due 9/26/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Mail Receipts) (Hacking, James)
July 14, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Reissued as to UR MENDOZA JADDOU, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (jd)
July 14, 2022 Filing 3 PRAECIPE to Reissue Summons by NISHA KALIA, RAJUL PANDYA (Attachments: #1 Summons Jaddou, #2 Summons US Attorney, #3 Summons Att. Gral.) (Hacking, James)
July 14, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to UR MENDOZA JADDOU, TERRI ROBINSON, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (jd) Modified on 7/14/2022, Removed summons 2-5 frompublic view, wrong documents attached, reissued at #4 (jd).
July 13, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UR MENDOZA JADDOU, TERRI ROBINSON, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7195084), filed by RAJUL PANDYA, NISHA KALIA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PANDYA et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RAJUL PANDYA
Represented By: James O Hacking, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NISHA KALIA
Represented By: James O Hacking, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UR MENDOZA JADDOU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TERRI ROBINSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?