SUTTON v. MCDONOUGH et al
THOMAS SUTTON |
SECRETARY DENIS MCDONOUGH, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 4, FAYETTE EMS, J.W. RUBY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, JANE DOE 5, JOHN DOE 5 and DENIS MCDONOUGH |
2:2022cv01030 |
July 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Marilyn J Horan |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by J.W. RUBY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL. (Boggs, Joshua) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by J.W. RUBY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL. J.W. RUBY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL waiver sent on 8/15/2022, answer due 10/14/2022. (Boggs, Joshua) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DENIS MCDONOUGH (dmh) |
Filing 3 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by THOMAS SUTTON (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Sansone, Joel) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER AND PROCEDURES ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 7/19/2022. (dmm) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANE DOE 1, JANE DOE 2, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 4, JANE DOE 5, JOHN DOE 5, FAYETTE EMS, J.W. RUBY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, DENIS MCDONOUGH, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7199482), filed by THOMAS SUTTON. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (dmh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.