ESTATE OF GRAYSON v. SANDERS et al
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF GRAYSON
Defendant: WILL SANDERS and 10 ZELT STREET TRUST
Case Number: 2:2022cv01037
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: W Scott Hardy
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER indicating that, #5 Plaintiff'/Petitioner's Motion to Strike Respondent Request to Dismiss is denied, as the Court has already entered an Order denying Plaintiff/Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, which has closed the case. To the extent Plaintiff/Petitioner's Motion is construed as a Motion for Reconsideration, it is hereby denied. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 8/22/2022. (kas)
August 17, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION to Strike #2 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by ESTATE OF GRAYSON. (ijh)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 JUDGMENT ORDER indicating that, the Court having dismissed this action by seperate Order of Court on this date, final judgment is entered against Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 8/17/2022. (kas)
August 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER indicating that #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied for Plaintiff/Petitioner's failure to establish that he is unable to pay the applicable filing fee based upon his existing assets and income, and granting #2 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Removal. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 8/17/2022. (kas) Modified on 8/17/2022 (kas).
August 2, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by 10 ZELT STREET TRUST. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order) (Terrell, Herbert)
July 19, 2022 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ESTATE OF GRAYSON. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal lodged pending dispostition of IFP Motion. Filed w/o State Court Records, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (ijh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ESTATE OF GRAYSON v. SANDERS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF GRAYSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WILL SANDERS
Represented By: Herbert A. Terrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 10 ZELT STREET TRUST
Represented By: Herbert A. Terrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?