WAKEFIELD et al v. SACKS et al
CHRIS WAKEFIELD, YASMIN SACKS and ELI SACKS |
YAAKOV (JACOB) SACKS, GMA, INC., THE REMY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION, INC. and JEREMY STERN |
2:2022cv01161 |
August 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Cathy Bissoon |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 BRIEF in Opposition re #5 Motion to Remand to State Court Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Remand filed by YAAKOV (JACOB) SACKS. (Levicoff, Avrum) |
Filing 10 ORDER Response re #5 Motion to Remand to State Court. Akin to analogous provisions regarding motions to dismiss, in the undersigned's Practices and Procedures (https://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/content/cathy-bissoon-district-judge), response(s) are due by 9/20/22. All future motions in this case will be governed by the undersigned's Practices and Procedures, and no briefing schedule will issue. If the parties consent to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge in this case, the parties must file a stipulation consenting to such jurisdiction on or before 9/12/2022. If any party declines to consent, no stipulation or other filing is required. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 9/1/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kly) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Ian Chesir-Teran to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 9/1/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kly) |
Filing 8 MOTION for attorney Ian Chesir-Teran to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-7270896) by GMA, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Chesir-Teran, Ian) |
Filing 7 DECLARATION re #6 Brief in Support of Motion, #5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by ELI SACKS, YASMIN SACKS, CHRIS WAKEFIELD Affiant: Dennis M. Blackwell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3) (Wolff, Peter) |
Filing 6 BRIEF in Support re #5 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by ELI SACKS, YASMIN SACKS, CHRIS WAKEFIELD. (Wolff, Peter) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Remand to State Court by ELI SACKS, YASMIN SACKS, CHRIS WAKEFIELD. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wolff, Peter) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by GMA, INC., YAAKOV (JACOB) SACKS, JEREMY STERN, THE REMY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION, INC. (Levicoff, Avrum) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 8/23/2022. (elt) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Peter S. Wolff on behalf of ELI SACKS, YASMIN SACKS. (Wolff, Peter) |
Filing 2 ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 8/12/2022. (kly) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number 02-21-09236 (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7221619), filed by YAAKOV (JACOB) SACKS, GMA, INC., JEREMY STERN, THE REMY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (elt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.