DOUGLASS v. NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC.
| BLAIR DOUGLASS |
| NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC. |
| 2:2022cv01167 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 8/18/2022. (cmc)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Settlement by BLAIR DOUGLASS (Tucker, Kevin) |
| Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC. on 8/19/2022. (mrm) Modified on 8/17/2022 (ijh). |
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER ON RULE 12(b) MOTIONS. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 8/16/2022. (cmc) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC. (ctb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from ALLEGHENY COUNTY, case number GD-22-008712 Copies attached: Complaint, Affidavit of Service, Docket Sheet (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7241792), filed by NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT COMPANY INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2) (ctb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
