WHITE v. FOSTER
Plaintiff: DANIEL R. WHITE
Defendant: CLARENCE T. FOSTER, III
Case Number: 2:2022cv01301
Filed: September 12, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: W Scott Hardy
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER indicating that, in light of #25 Joint Status Report of the Parties, Defendant Clarence T. Foster III shall answer, plead or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by 11/21/2022. If Defendant Foster submits a motion pursuant to Rule 12, Plaintiff's response is due by 12/12/2022 and Defendant's reply, if any, is due by 12/19/2022. Additionally, Defendant Foster shall respond to #13 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 12/19/2022. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 11/7/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kas)
November 4, 2022 Filing 25 STATUS REPORT (Joint) by DANIEL R. WHITE. (Diehr, Matthew)
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER indicating that, in light of #23 Joint Status Report, the parties are to continue efforts as directed at the status conference held on 10/3/2022, and as outlined in said Joint Status Report. The parties shall file another Joint Status Report by 11/4/2022. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 10/20/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kas)
October 17, 2022 Filing 23 STATUS REPORT (Joint Status Report) by DANIEL R. WHITE. (Diehr, Matthew)
October 3, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER indicating that the parties shall file a joint status report by 10/17/2022 as directed by the Court at the Status Conference held on 10/3/2022. Additional status conferences and hearings will be scheduled by further Order of Court. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 10/3/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kas)
October 3, 2022 Filing 21 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge W. Scott Hardy: Status Conference held on 10/3/2022. (Court Reporter: Deborah Rowe) (kas)
September 27, 2022 Filing 20 BRIEF in Support re #13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by DANIEL R. WHITE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Joint Action by Unanimous Consent, #2 Exhibit 2 Amended Operating Agreement, #3 Exhibit 3 Consent, #4 Exhibit 4 Todd Sakalosky Declaration, #5 Exhibit 5 Letter dated 8-26-2022, #6 Exhibit 6 Chris Budke Declaration) (Cocchi, Thomas)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER indicating that a Telephonic Status Conference is set for 10/3/2022 at 11:30 AM before Judge W. Scott Hardy. The parties are to refer to Docket No. #18 for dial-in information. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 9/27/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kas)
September 27, 2022 Filing 18 AT&T CONFERENCING INFORMATION FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted before Judge W. Scott Hardy will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this document. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only," so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (kas)
September 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #14 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit. Plaintiff shall file his Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction, along with its accompanying declarations, and exhibits as found at Exhibit 2 of the motion (Docket No. [14-2]. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 9/27/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kas)
September 26, 2022 Filing 16 Errata re #14 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages by DANIEL R. WHITE. Reason for Correction: Signature on document and filer do not match. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 2 Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction) (Cocchi, Thomas)
September 26, 2022 Filing 15 Errata re #13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction by DANIEL R. WHITE. Reason for Correction: Signature on document and filer do not match. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Cocchi, Thomas)
September 26, 2022 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #13 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. ERROR: Signature on document and filer do not match. CORRECTION: Attorney advised of signature requirements. Attorney to resubmit the document using the Errata event. (keh)
September 23, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by DANIEL R. WHITE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 2 Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction) (Diehr, Matthew) Link added to Errata filed at #16 . Modified on 9/26/2022 (keh).
September 23, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by DANIEL R. WHITE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Diehr, Matthew) Link added to Errata filed at #15 . Modified on 9/26/2022 (keh).
September 22, 2022 Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by DANIEL R. WHITE. CLARENCE T. FOSTER, III waiver sent on 9/15/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Diehr, Matthew) Modified to update dates on 9/23/2022 (keh).
September 20, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin P. Allen on behalf of CLARENCE T. FOSTER, III. (Allen, Kevin)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Jeffrey B Jensen to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 9/14/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kas)
September 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Matthew P. Diehr to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 9/14/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (kas)
September 14, 2022 Filing 8 Proposed Order re #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice re Matthew P. Diehr by DANIEL R. WHITE. (Diehr, Matthew)
September 14, 2022 Filing 7 Proposed Order re #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jeffrey B Jensen by DANIEL R. WHITE. (Jensen, Jeffrey)
September 14, 2022 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ERROR: Proposed Order was not attached. CORRECTION: Attorney is advised to file a proposed order by using the Proposed Order event and linking it to the document in question. CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE. ERROR: Typed name omitted by s/ on Affidavit. CORRECTION: Attorney advised of signature requirements. Attorney to resubmit Affidavit with signature, using Errata event. (keh)
September 14, 2022 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ERROR: Proposed Order was not attached. CORRECTION: Attorney is advised to file a proposed order by using the Proposed Order event and linking it to the document in question. (keh)
September 13, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION for attorney Jeffrey B Jensen to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-7292038) by DANIEL R. WHITE. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In Support of PHV Motion) (Jensen, Jeffrey)
September 13, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Matthew P. Diehr to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-7292016) by DANIEL R. WHITE. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Matthew P. Diehr) (Diehr, Matthew)
September 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER on Motions Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). See Order for further details. Signed by Judge W. Scott Hardy on 09/13/2022. (dms)
September 13, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE that the instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. The Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the Stipulation of Selecting an ADR process and Neutral. Counsel for Plaintiff(s) (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing Defendant(s)) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (dms)
September 13, 2022 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to CLARENCE T. FOSTER, III (keh)
September 12, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CLARENCE T. FOSTER, III (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7289747), filed by DANIEL R. WHITE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4) (keh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WHITE v. FOSTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DANIEL R. WHITE
Represented By: Jeffrey Jensen
Represented By: Matthew P Diehr
Represented By: Thomas F Cocchi, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CLARENCE T. FOSTER, III
Represented By: Kevin P. Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?