MOORE v. UPMC EAST
Plaintiff: ROSALIE JONES MOORE
Defendant: UPMC EAST
Case Number: 2:2022cv01468
Filed: October 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: David S Cercone
Nature of Suit: Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER implementing Rule 502(d) at the Joint Request of the Parties. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 12/15/2022. (kak)
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. David B. White, Esquire is appointed as the mediator. Mediation shall be conducted by 2/24/2023. The report of mediator shall be electronically filed within 7 days of the mediation conference. John J. Myers, Esquire is designated as lead counsel. DAVID B. WHITE is added. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 12/15/2022. (kak)
December 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: Post Discovery Status Conference to be scheduled upon motion of the parties. The parties shall move to amend pleadings or add new parties by 4/7/2023. Discovery ends 5/8/2023. Plaintiffs Pretrial Statement due by 6/8/2023. Defendants Pretrial Statement due by 7/10/2023. Pretrial Stipulation due by 7/20/2023. Motions for Summary Judgment due by 8/21/2023. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 12/15/2022. (kak)
December 13, 2022 Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge David S. Cercone: Initial Case Management Conference held on 12/13/2022.The Clerks met with counsel to explore appropriate measures for pretrial development and to determine whether the parties have completed all prerequisites for completion of the ADR process. The parties have selected mediation to be conducted before David White, Esquire. Costs to be split 50/50. The ADR session must be completed on or before February 24, 2023. Attorney Myers designated liaison counsel for ADR purposes. A jury-trial CMO with fact discovery through May 7, 2023, a Rule 502(d) order and an ADR referral order will follow. (Court Reporter: none) (kmk)
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The Initial Case Management Conference scheduled for December 12, 2022, at 11:00 A.M. will be conducted by video conference via Zoom.gov. A member of chambers staff will send a Zoom.gov invite (by email) to counsel of record prior to the hearing. The invite will supply the hyperlinks available for participating in the conference. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 12/9/2022. (kmk)
November 21, 2022 Filing 9 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Steenland, Kyle)
November 21, 2022 Filing 8 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by ROSALIE JONES MOORE. (Steenland, Kyle)
October 27, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Cottington on behalf of UPMC EAST. (Cottington, Laura)
October 27, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (kak)
October 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 INITIAL LOCAL RULE 16.1 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for December 12, 2022 at 11:00 AM by Video Conference before Judge David S. Cercone. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before November 7, 2022; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by November 21, 2022. Details more fully stated in Order. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 10/27/2022. (lyk)
October 24, 2022 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement identifying UPMC as corporate parent or other affiliate, by UPMC EAST. (Myers, John)
October 24, 2022 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint by UPMC EAST. (Myers, John)
October 18, 2022 Filing 2 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Notice of Removal. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement as required pursuant L.R. 7.1.1. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days. Disclosure Statement due by 10/25/2022. (av)
October 17, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, case number GD-22-007978 with Jury Demand. Copies attached: Complaint, Writ of Summons, Rule to File Complaint (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7347791), filed by UPMC EAST. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Writ of Summons, #3 Rule to File Complaint, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (av)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MOORE v. UPMC EAST
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROSALIE JONES MOORE
Represented By: Kyle H. Steenland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UPMC EAST
Represented By: John J. Myers
Represented By: Laura Cottington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?