KUZNIK v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
| MARYBETH KUZNIK |
| ARMSTRONG COUNTY and JEFFREY JESSELL |
| 2:2022cv01651 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| J Nicholas Ranjan |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MARYBETH KUZNIK. ARMSTRONG COUNTY waiver sent on 11/22/2022, answer due 1/23/2023; JEFFREY JESSELL waiver sent on 11/22/2022, answer due 1/23/2023. (keh) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by MARYBETH KUZNIK. JEFFREY JESSELL served on 12/15/2022, answer due 1/5/2023; ARMSTRONG COUNTY served on 12/15/2022, answer due 1/5/2023., WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MARYBETH KUZNIK. JEFFREY JESSELL waiver sent on 12/15/2022, answer due 1/5/2023; ARMSTRONG COUNTY waiver sent on 12/15/2022, answer due 1/5/2023. (Roesch, Max) Document removed from public view and redocketed at #4 . Modified on 12/20/2022 (keh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to ARMSTRONG COUNTY, JEFFREY JESSELL (Attachments: #1 Summons Jessell) (keh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARMSTRONG COUNTY, JEFFREY JESSELL (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7404921), filed by MARYBETH KUZNIK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (keh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
