EVANS v. SHAPIRO et al
| CARLOS DELANE EVANS and CARLOS DELONE EVANS |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, PENNSYLVANIA STATE PROBATION PAROLE, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and WASHINGTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY |
| 2:2022cv01713 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Lisa Pupo Lenihan |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by WASHINGTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Walsh, Jason) |
| Filing 7 Notice of appearance by Jason Walsh as to COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA STATE PROBATION PAROLE, JOSH SHAPIRO, WASHINGTON COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY. (Walsh, Jason) Modified text on 1/26/2023. (jv) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. (Walsh, Jason) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. ERROR: Wrong event selected. CORRECTION: Modified original entry to terminate as a motion and reword as "Notice of Appearance". This message is for informational purposes only. (jv) |
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING that the United States Marshal shall make service of this order, together with a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF. No. #4 ) upon the named respondents, the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole as well as Josh Shapiro, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and the Washington County District Attorney, with costs to be advanced by the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of service of this order, respondents shall respond to the allegations of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Attorney General shall address both the merits of the petition and exhaustion of state court remedies. The answer shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The Attorney General shall furnish this Court with the pertinent state court and probation/parole records in this matter. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are allowed fourteen (14) days from this date to appeal this order to a district judge pursuant to Rule 72.C.2 of the Local Rules. Failure to appeal within fourteen (14) days will constitute waiver of the right to appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 12/19/2022. (jmb)
|
| Remark: Service copies were forwarded to the U.S. Marshal. (jmb) |
| Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by CARLOS DELONE EVANS. (jv) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER GRANTING the #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court file the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus FORTHWITH. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan on 12/07/2022. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jmb)
|
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by CARLOS DELANE EVANS. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (jma) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by CARLOS DELANE EVANS. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Envelope) (jma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
