FENDERSON v. LEMPKE et al
Plaintiff: GENE ANDRE FENDERSON
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER LEMPKE and CITIZENS BANK
Case Number: 2:2023cv00170
Filed: February 2, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Mark R Hornak
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2023 Filing 9 Remark: On this date a copy of #8 Memorandum Order was mailed to Mr. Fenderson. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
February 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER. As described herein, The Court construes Plaintiff's filing at ECF No. #7 as a Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration ECF NO. #7 is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 2/16/23. (bdb)
February 15, 2023 Filing 7 EXHIBITS in Support of #5 Complaint by GENE ANDRE FENDERSON. (dmh) Modified on 2/16/23 to set entry for case participants only on the basis that these documents contain personally identifying financial and other information - per MRH on this date. (bdb)
February 13, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE. Documents received by Chambers. Following the Court's review of said documents, no further action will be taken. (bdb)
February 7, 2023 Filing 4 Remark: On this date, a copy of #3 Memorandum Order was mailed to Gene Fenderson. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
February 6, 2023 Filing 5 COMPLAINT against CITIZENS BANK, CHRISTOPHER LEMPKE, filed by GENE ANDRE FENDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (dmh)
February 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER. For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff's Motion to procced in forma pauperis is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 2/6/23. (jad)
February 2, 2023 Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by GENE ANDRE FENDERSON. (dmh)
February 2, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by GENE ANDRE FENDERSON. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Expedited Docket Stipulation, #5 Disclosure Statement, #6 Claim for Exemption) (dmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FENDERSON v. LEMPKE et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GENE ANDRE FENDERSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER LEMPKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITIZENS BANK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?