PHILLIPPI v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A. et al
DEBRA A. PHILLIPPI |
YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A. and YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA |
2:2023cv00396 |
March 10, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
David S Cercone |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
Filing 11 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge David S. Cercone: Initial Case Management Conference held on 6/1/2023. The Clerks met with counsel to discuss appropriate measures for pretrial development of the case and to assure that all prerequisites for the ADR process have been completed. Attorney Clements designated liaison counsel for the ADR process. The parties have selected mediation to be conducted before Robert J. Behling, Esquire. Costs to be split 50/50. The ADR session must occur on or before December 31, 2023. A jury-trial CMO with fact discovery through November 30, 2023, a Rule 502(d) order and an ADR referral order will follow.(Court Reporter: none) (mwm) |
|
Filing 9 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Regarding Confidentiality of Documents and Materials by YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A., YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Trischler, Clem) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION selecting ADR process by YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A., YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA. (Trischler, Clem) |
Filing 7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Trischler, Clem) |
|
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A.. (Trischler, Clem) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA. (Trischler, Clem) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (kak) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying Yamaha Motor Company, Ltd. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A., YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA. (Trischler, Clem) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Notice of Removal. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement identifying all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates that have issued shares or debt securities to the public as required pursuant to LR 7.1.A AND identifying citizenship pursuant to FRCvP 7.1(a)(2), which took effect on December 1, 2022. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.A and/or FRCvP 7.1(a)(2)). Disclosure Statement due by 3/17/2023. (ctb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Fayette County, case number 2022-2280 with Jury Demand Copies attached: State Pleadings, Original Complaint (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7579955), filed by YAMAHA MOTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, YAMAHA MOTOR CORPORATION, U.S.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D) (ctb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.