CASTLE CO-PACKERS, LLC v. BUSCH MACHINERY, INC. et al
CASTLE CO-PACKERS, LLC |
BUSCH MACHINERY, INC. and MICK MOST |
2:2023cv00459 |
March 16, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Nora Barry Fischer |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER denying #13 MOTION to Dismiss filed by MICK MOST, BUSCH MACHINERY, INC. as premature, and without prejudice; and the parties shall meet and confer as the Court has directed and file a Status Report with the Court by May 23, 2023. As per the Court's Practices, "[e]mail communications are not sufficient." Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/9/2023. (lyk) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #13 Motion to Dismiss. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement identifying all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates that have issued shares or debt securities to the public as required pursuant to LR 7.1.A AND IDENTIFYING CITIZENSHIP pursuant to FRCvP 7.1(a)(2), which took effect on December 1, 2022. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.A and/or FRCvP 7.1(a)(2)). Disclosure Statement due by 5/16/2023. (jd) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss by BUSCH MACHINERY, INC., MICK MOST. (Sommer, Brad) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Brad N. Sommer on behalf of BUSCH MACHINERY, INC., MICK MOST. (Sommer, Brad) |
Filing 11 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by CASTLE CO-PACKERS, LLC Answer due from BUSCH MACHINERY, INC. on 5/8/2023; MICK MOST on 5/8/2023. (Roskovensky, Vincent) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #9 Affidavit of Service. ERROR: Wrong event selected. CORRECTION: Re-docketed as Return of Service Returned Executed. This message is for informational purposes only. (jma) |
Filing 10 Return of Service Returned Executed by CASTLE CO-PACKERS, LLC. BUSCH MACHINERY, INC. served on 3/31/2023, answer due 4/21/2023; MICK MOST served on 3/31/2023, answer due 4/21/2023. (jma) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service , filed by CASTLE CO-PACKERS, LLC. (Buck, Ashley) |
Filing 8 ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions. Details more fully stated in Order. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/17/2023. (lyk) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE: Motions Practice. Details more fully stated in Order. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 3/17/2023. (lyk) |
Filing 6 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (lyk) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to BUSCH MACHINERY, INC., MICK MOST (jd) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Ashley L Buck on behalf of CASTLE CO-PACKERS, LLC. (Buck, Ashley) |
Filing 3 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by CASTLE CO-PACKERS, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Roskovensky, Vincent) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by CASTLE CO-PACKERS, LLC. (Roskovensky, Vincent) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BUSCH MACHINERY, INC., MICK MOST (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7593375), filed by CASTLE CO-PACKERS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.