XODUS MEDICAL, INC. v. THE SOULE CO.
| XODUS MEDICAL, INC. |
| THE SOULE CO. doing business as SOULE MEDICAL |
| 2:2023cv00586 |
| April 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| J Nicholas Ranjan |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by XODUS MEDICAL, INC.. THE SOULE CO. served on 5/31/2023, answer due 6/21/2023. (Brooks, Anthony) |
| Filing 13 Summons Issued as to THE SOULE CO. (ctb) |
| Filing 12 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by XODUS MEDICAL, INC. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (Baldauf, Kent) |
| Filing 11 COPYRIGHT DOCUMENTS ISSUED. Emailed copy of Transmittal Letter, AO 121 Form, Complaint, Exhibits and Docket Sheet to the Register of Copyrights. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 AO 121 Notice, #11 Docket Sheet) (ctb) |
| Filing 10 AO 121 NOTICE by XODUS MEDICAL, INC. (Baldauf, Kent) |
| Filing 9 Remark: Letter to Patent/Trademark Commissioner re #2 PATENT/TRADEMARK DOCUMENTS ISSUED. Notice delivered to Commissioner by NEF (ctb) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Complaint. Attorney to submit AO 121 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or appeal Regarding a Copyright. Attorney advised to file the Notice within 7 days. The link to the report can be found under Other Forms at: http://www.uscourts.gov/FormsAndFees/Forms/CourtFormsByCategory.aspx (ctb) |
| Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan presiding. (jma) |
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to another member of the court for all further proceedings. Judge Joy Flowers Conti no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 4/13/2023. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (lyk)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly recused. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 4/11/2023. (et)
|
| Judge Joy Flowers Conti presiding. (jma) |
|
Filing 6
As detailed in the accompanying Order, given that motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 are discouraged if the pleading defect is curable by amendment, IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of any Rule 12 motion, including motions for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), to determine whether it can be avoided. The duty to meet and confer extends to parties appearing pro se. Consistent with the foregoing, Rule 12 motions must be accompanied by a certificate of the movant, stating that the moving party has made a good faith effort to confer with the nonmovant(s) to determine whether the identified pleading deficiencies properly may be cured by amendment. Rule 12 motions that do not contain the required certification will be summarily denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 4/10/2023. (et)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony W. Brooks on behalf of XODUS MEDICAL, INC.. (Brooks, Anthony) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas C. Wolski on behalf of XODUS MEDICAL, INC.. (Wolski, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by XODUS MEDICAL, INC.. (Baldauf, Kent) |
| Filing 2 PATENT/TRADEMARK DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (Attachments: #1 Docket Sheet, #2 Complaint, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6, #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8) (ctb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against THE SOULE CO. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7627414), filed by XODUS MEDICAL, INC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8) (ctb) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Complaint. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement identifying all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates that have issued shares or debt securities to the public as required pursuant to LR 7.1.A. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.A and/or FRCvP 7.1(a)(2)). Disclosure Statement due by 4/13/2023. (ctb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: XODUS MEDICAL, INC. v. THE SOULE CO. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: XODUS MEDICAL, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Anthony W. Brooks |
| Represented By: | Kent E. Baldauf, Jr. |
| Represented By: | Thomas C. Wolski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE SOULE CO. doing business as SOULE MEDICAL | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
