SAUL et al v. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE
| GREGORY J. SAUL and ANNETTE SAUL |
| U.S. POSTAL SERVICE |
| 2:2023cv00700 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cathy Bissoon |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Errata re #3 Stipulation by U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. Reason for Correction: Original stipulation did not contain signatures of both Plaintiffs. (Wilk, Ryan) |
| This case has been dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), see Stip (Doc. #3 , as amended in #4 ), and has been marked closed. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 5/17/23. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (dcd) |
| Filing 3 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by U.S. POSTAL SERVICE (Wilk, Ryan). Document removed from view and refiled as an Errata at #4 . Modified text on 5/17/2023. (dmh) |
Filing 2
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss, as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Cathy Bissoon on 5/5/2023. (sps)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number MJ-05-220-CV-22-2023, filed by U.S. POSTAL SERVICE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit) (cel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
