INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 29, AFL-CIO v. ENERGY HARBOR NUCLEAR CORPORATION
| INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 29, AFL-CIO |
| ENERGY HARBOR NUCLEAR CORPORATION |
| 2:2023cv00761 |
| May 9, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Maureen P Kelly |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ENERGY HARBOR NUCLEAR CORPORATION. ENERGY HARBOR NUCLEAR CORPORATION waiver sent on 5/9/2023, answer due 7/10/2023. (Baisden, Eric) |
Filing 3
As detailed in the accompanying Order, given that motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 are discouraged if the pleading defect is curable by amendment, IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of any Rule 12 motion, including motions for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), to determine whether it can be avoided. The duty to meet and confer extends to parties appearing pro se. Consistent with the foregoing, Rule 12 motions must be accompanied by a certificate of the movant, stating that the moving party has made a good faith effort to confer with the nonmovant(s) to determine whether the identified pleading deficiencies properly may be cured by amendment. Rule 12 motions that do not contain the required certification will be summarily denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 5/11/2023. (et)
|
| Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly added. (jma) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE, the Clerk of Court shall reassign this case to another Judge on this Court. Judge Nora Barry Fischer no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 5/9/2023. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdk)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ENERGY HARBOR NUCLEAR CORPORATION (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7678677), filed by INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 29, AFL-CIO. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F) (ctb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 29, AFL-CIO v. ENERGY HARBOR NUCLEAR CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 29, AFL-CIO | |
| Represented By: | Amanda B. Bundick |
| Represented By: | Robert A. Eberle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: ENERGY HARBOR NUCLEAR CORPORATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
