JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INC. v. GPX ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC
JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INC. |
GPX ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC |
2:2023cv00767 |
May 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Joy Flowers Conti |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INC. (Grant, Adam) |
Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice by JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INC.. (Grant, Adam) Removed from view at request of attorney as incorrect event; attorney indicated refiling of voluntary dismissal; Modified text on 6/7/2023. (ctb) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INC.. GPX ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC served on 5/25/2023, answer due 6/15/2023. (Grant, Adam) |
Filing 5 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, by JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INC. (Grant, Adam) |
Filing 4 ORDER ON MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 5/10/2023. (map) |
Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (map) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to GPX ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC. (jma) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Complaint,. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement identifying all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates that have issued shares or debt securities to the public as required pursuant to LR 7.1.A AND identifying citizenship pursuant to FRCvP 7.1(a)(2), which took effect on December 1, 2022. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.A and/or FRCvP 7.1(a)(2)). Disclosure Statement due by 5/17/2023. (jma) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against GPX ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7679534), filed by JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5) (jma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INC. v. GPX ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JACK DOHENY COMPANIES, INC. | |
Represented By: | Adam D. Grant |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: GPX ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.