RUSSELL v. WALKER et al
Petitioner: JAMES LEONARD RUSSELL
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 2:2023cv00879
Filed: May 26, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Cynthia Reed Eddy
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Marshal shall make service of this Order, together with a copy of the Petition (ECF No. 4) upon the Respondents: (1) the Superintendent of SCI Fayette, (2) the District Attorney of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, and (3) the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Service shall be by certified mail. All costs to be advanced by the United States. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of service of this Order, the District Attorney shall file an Answer to the Petition on behalf of all Respondents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 7/12/2023. (cmc)
July 5, 2023 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 200004594), filed by JAMES LEONARD RUSSELL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (jd)
July 5, 2023 Filing 3 Habeas Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 200004594 (jd)
May 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING. This action may not proceed unless the Petitioner either tenders to the "Clerk, U.S. District Court" the statutory filing fee in the amount of $5.00; or, files a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, as more fully set forth in the attached Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is to mark this case administratively CLOSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 5/30/2023. (cmc)
May 26, 2023 Filing 1 Remark: Habeas Petition lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope) (jd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: RUSSELL v. WALKER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JAMES LEONARD RUSSELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?