PIZZINO v. BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC
| JOANN M. PIZZINO |
| BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC |
| 2:2023cv01154 |
| June 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| David S Cercone |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS by BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC. (Alexander Savino, Angela) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #7 Stipulation Selecting ADR Process. ERROR: Stipulation Selecting ADR Process form is outdated. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to use the updated Stipulation Selecting ADR Process form, with the revision date of 4/2017, for future filings. The updated form can be found at the court's website, under the Forms link, at #here. This message is for informational purposes only. (kss) |
| Filing 6 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Alexander Savino, Angela) |
Filing 5
INITIAL LOCAL RULE 16.1 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for August 30, 2023 at 10:00 AM by Video Conference. The Conference will be conducted by video conference via Zoom.gov. A member of chambers staff will send a Zoom.gov invite (by email) to counsel of record prior to the hearing. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before July 19, 2023; Rule 26 Meeting Report due by August 2, 2023. Details more fully stated in Order. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 7/5/2023. (lyk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (kak) |
| Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint With Affirmative Defenses by BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC. (Alexander Savino, Angela) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying Retail Store Operations, Inc. as corporate parent or other affiliate, by BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC. (ctb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD-23-6092 Copies attached: State Pleadings (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7743825), filed by BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ctb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PIZZINO v. BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: JOANN M. PIZZINO | |
| Represented By: | Richard G. Talarico |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BATH & BODY WORKS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Angela M Alexander Savino |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
