WILLIAMS v. WETZEL et al
| RASHAD M. WILLIAMS and MELVIN WILLIAMS |
| JOHN E. WETZEL, GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL R. HARRY, ERIC T. ARMEL, TINA WALKER, JOSEPH TREMPUS, MICHAEL T. KACS, MARTIN SWITZER, JOSHUA POSKA, MIKE HOWARD, CAPTAIN NEWMAN, B. KING, CEKADA, ROBERT HAWKINBERRY, DEBRA HAWKINBERRY, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, HALKIAS, RUDZIEWSKI, WINKLEMAN, PEACHECK, L. ALLEN and M. BROWN |
| 2:2023cv01235 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Cynthia Reed Eddy |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Partial Payment of Filing Fee by RASHAD M. WILLIAMS. Fee $5.00, receipt number 200005360. (sms) |
| Filing 12 Partial Payment of Filing Fee by RASHAD M. WILLIAMS. Fee $8.00, receipt number 200005226. (sms) |
| Filing 11 Partial Payment of Filing Fee by RASHAD M. WILLIAMS. Fee $3.60, receipt number 200005229. (sms) |
| Filing 10 Partial Payment of Filing Fee by RASHAD M. WILLIAMS. Fee $2.52, receipt number 200005224. (sms) |
| Filing 9 COMPLAINT against L. ALLEN, ERIC T. ARMEL, M. BROWN, CEKADA, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2, JOHN DOE 3, HALKIAS, LAUREL R. HARRY, DEBRA HAWKINBERRY, ROBERT HAWKINBERRY, MIKE HOWARD, MICHAEL T. KACS, B. KING, GEORGE LITTLE, NEWMAN, PEACHECK, JOSHUA POSKA, RUDZIEWSKI, MARTIN SWITZER, JOSEPH TREMPUS, TINA WALKER, JOHN E. WETZEL, WINKLEMAN ), filed by RASHAD M. WILLIAMS. (elt) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RASHAD M. WILLIAMS. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 7) is GRANTED to the extent that the case may proceed without the prepayment of the entire filing fee and the Clerk of Court is directed to file the Complaint. Plaintiff is advised that no further action will be taken in this case until the initial partial fee of $21.74 is paid in full, as more fully set forth in the attached Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 7/25/2023. (cmc)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by RASHAD M. WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Authorization by Prisoner, #2 Envelope) (jkn) |
| Filing 6 Remark: Authorization by prisoner received with no motion for IFP. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jkn) Document removed from view and redocketed at #7 Modified text on 7/25/2023. (jkn) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by RASHAD M. WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jkn) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by RASHAD M. WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (kss) |
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM and ORDER FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSING. Plaintiff has failed to submit the filing fee or a properly completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, including an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such prisoner possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case administratively closed, as more fully set forth in the attached Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 7/11/2023. (cmc)
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING PRACTICE ORDER FOR PRO SE CIVIL RIGHTS CASES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 7/11/2023. (cmc)
|
| Filing 1 Remark: Complaint lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
