PEACHY v. CARTIVA, INC. et al
KELLY M PEACHY |
CARTIVA, INC., WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP, N.V. and STRYKER B.V. |
2:2023cv01416 |
August 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
William S Stickman |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP, N.V. (Attachments: #1 Summons Cartiva, Inc., #2 Summons Stryker B.V.) (jkn) |
Filing 3 PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by KELLY M PEACHY (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (Lupetin, Brendan) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by KELLY M PEACHY. (Lupetin, Brendan) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Complaint, ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement identifying citizenship pursuant to FRCvP 7.1(a)(2), which took effect on December 1, 2022. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.A and/or FRCvP 7.1(a)(2)). Disclosure Statement due by 8/17/2023. (jkn) |
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy no longer assigned to case. (jkn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CARTIVA, INC., STRYKER B.V., WRIGHT MEDICAL GROUP, N.V. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7823419), filed by KELLY M PEACHY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jkn) |
Judge William S. Stickman added as presider. (jkn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.