LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. S. WATKINS EXCAVATING et al
Plaintiff: LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Defendant: S. WATKINS EXCAVATING and SHAWN WATKINS
Case Number: 2:2023cv01639
Filed: September 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Maureen P Kelly
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2023 Filing 6 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA. S. WATKINS EXCAVATING served on 9/21/2023, answer due 10/12/2023. (Scherer, David)
October 3, 2023 Filing 5 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA. SHAWN WATKINS served on 9/21/2023, answer due 10/12/2023. (Scherer, David)
September 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 As detailed in the accompanying Order, given that motions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 are discouraged if the pleading defect is curable by amendment, IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that the parties must meet and confer prior to the filing of any Rule 12 motion, including motions for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), to determine whether it can be avoided. The duty to meet and confer extends to parties appearing pro se. Consistent with the foregoing, Rule 12 motions must be accompanied by a certificate of the movant, stating that the moving party has made a good faith effort to confer with the nonmovant(s) to determine whether the identified pleading deficiencies properly may be cured by amendment. Rule 12 motions that do not contain the required certification will be summarily denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly on 9/15/2023. (et)
September 15, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to S. WATKINS EXCAVATING, SHAWN WATKINS (Attachments: #1 Summons) (jd)
September 13, 2023 Filing 3 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate by LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA. (jd)
September 13, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against S. WATKINS EXCAVATING, SHAWN WATKINS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7880744), filed by LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. S. WATKINS EXCAVATING et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LABORERS COMBINED FUNDS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: David L. Scherer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: S. WATKINS EXCAVATING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SHAWN WATKINS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?