COVESTRO LLC v. VICTOR POLYMERS CORP.
| COVESTRO LLC |
| VICTOR POLYMERS CORP. |
| 2:2023cv01712 |
| October 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Joy Flowers Conti |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re re #1 Complaint filed by COVESTRO LLC. VICTOR POLYMERS CORP. answer due 12/8/2023. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 12/4/2023. (lyk)
|
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by COVESTRO LLC by VICTOR POLYMERS CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Goodman, Eric) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by COVESTRO LLC. VICTOR POLYMERS CORP. answer due by 12/1/2023. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 11/22/2023. (lyk)
|
| Filing 12 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by COVESTRO LLC by VICTOR POLYMERS CORP.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Goodman, Eric) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by COVESTRO LLC. VICTOR POLYMERS CORP. answer due 11/21/2023. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 11/20/2023. (lyk)
|
| Filing 10 Proposed Order re #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer by VICTOR POLYMERS CORP.. (Goodman, Eric) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. ERROR: Proposed Order, which is required for all motions in civil cases per Local Rule LCvR7, was not attached. CORRECTION: Attorney is advised to file a proposed order by using the Proposed Order event and linking it to the document in question. (sdp) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint filed by COVESTRO LLC by VICTOR POLYMERS CORP.. (Goodman, Eric) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric R. Goodman on behalf of VICTOR POLYMERS CORP.. (Goodman, Eric) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by COVESTRO LLC. VICTOR POLYMERS CORP. served on 10/10/2023, answer due 10/31/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Thurston, Alexis) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexis B. Thurston on behalf of COVESTRO LLC. (Thurston, Alexis) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas D. Maxson on behalf of COVESTRO LLC. (Maxson, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, declaring citizenship by COVESTRO LLC. (Shrayber, Fridrikh) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to VICTOR POLYMERS CORP. (sdp) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement identifying CITIZENSHIP pursuant to FRCvP 7.1(a)(2), which took effect on December 1, 2022. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.A and/or FRCvP 7.1(a)(2))., CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement identifying all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates that have issued shares or debt securities to the public as required pursuant to LR 7.1.A. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.A and/or FRCvP 7.1(a)(2))., CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement identifying all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates that have issued shares or debt securities to the public as required pursuant to LR 7.1.A AND identifying CITIZENSHIP pursuant to FRCvP 7.1(a)(2), which took effect on December 1, 2022. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.A and/or FRCvP 7.1(a)(2)). Disclosure Statement due by 10/10/2023. (sdp) |
| Filing 3 EXHIBITS in Support of #1 Complaint by COVESTRO LLC. (sdp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VICTOR POLYMERS CORP. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7907705), filed by COVESTRO LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: COVESTRO LLC v. VICTOR POLYMERS CORP. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: COVESTRO LLC | |
| Represented By: | Fridrikh V. Shrayber |
| Represented By: | Alexis B. Thurston |
| Represented By: | Thomas D. Maxson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: VICTOR POLYMERS CORP. | |
| Represented By: | Eric R. Goodman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
