PGH BURGER AND FRIES, INC., v. FOREMOST GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGANINSURANCE COMPANY
PGH BURGER AND FRIES, INC., |
FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN |
2:2023cv01713 |
September 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Arthur J Schwab |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER setting Initial Case Management Conference for 12/12/2023 at 09:30 AM by Video Conference before Judge Arthur J. Schwab. 26(f) Report, Proposed Case Management Order, and ADR Stipulation are due on 12/5/2023. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 11/13/2023. (lar) |
Filing 8 Errata re 1 Notice of Removal, by FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN. Reason for Correction: Def's Answer and New Matter to PL's Complaint wasn't attached to Petition for Removal as an Exhibit. (Monahan, Patricia) |
Filing 7 STATUS REPORT by PGH BURGER AND FRIES, INC.,. (Bercik, P.) |
Filing 6 TEXT ORDER that no later than 12:00 P.M. (noon) on 11/9/23, the parties shall meet, confer, and file a joint status report with respect to the status of this civil action. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 11/3/23. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bfm) |
Filing 5 ORDER Re: Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 10/2/23. (ms) |
Filing 4 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (ms) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN. (Monahan, Patricia) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate by FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN. (bjr) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD-22-15126 (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7907688), filed by FOREMOST GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGANINSURANCE COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C) (bjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: PGH BURGER AND FRIES, INC., v. FOREMOST GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGANINSURANCE COMPANY | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: PGH BURGER AND FRIES, INC., | |
Represented By: | P. William Bercik |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN | |
Represented By: | Patricia A. Monahan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.