STANFORD HEALTH CARE v. HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
| STANFORD HEALTH CARE |
| HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD |
| 2:2023cv01732 |
| October 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Marilyn J Horan |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
BRIEF in Opposition re #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by STANFORD HEALTH CARE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss) (Rogers-Aberman, Karlene)
|
|
Filing 9
BRIEF in Support re #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD. (Allegretto, Alessandra)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Allegretto, Alessandra)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER AND PROCEDURES ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE available #Here Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 10/10/2023. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bjl)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Response to Complaint HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD answer due 11/10/2023. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 10/10/2023. (bjl)
|
|
Filing 4
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Response to Complaint by HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Allegretto, Alessandra)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by William J. Sheridan on behalf of HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD. (Sheridan, William)
|
|
Judge Arthur J. Schwab no longer assigned to case. (bjr)
|
|
Judge Marilyn J. Horan added. (bjr)
|
|
Filing 2
Disclosure Statement identifying Highmark Inc. as corporate parent or other affiliate by HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD. (Allegretto, Alessandra)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny county, case number GD-23-010373 Copies attached: state court record (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7915125), filed by HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: STANFORD HEALTH CARE v. HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STANFORD HEALTH CARE | |
| Represented By: | Karlene J Rogers-Aberman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD | |
| Represented By: | Alessandra Allegretto |
| Represented By: | William J. Sheridan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
