PARKER v. ROBINHOOD CYRPTO LLC
| JAQUAN PARKER and JA'QUAN PARKER |
| ROBINHOOD CYRPTO LLC |
| 2:2023cv01737 |
| October 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Robert J Colville |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER denying without prejudice #5 Motion to Certify Class. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 11/16/23. (cjo)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Certify Class by JAQUAN PARKER. (rtm) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ROBINHOOD CYRPTO LLC, filed by JAQUAN PARKER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (rtm) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against ROBINHOOD CYRPTO LLC, filed by JAQUAN PARKER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (rtm) |
|
Filing 2
MEMORANDUM ORDER: For the reason's stated in the order, the Court will grant Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and sua sponte dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint on or before November 27, 2023. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 10/27/23. (cjo)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JAQUAN PARKER. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (rtm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
