LOTUS FOODS BOSTON, LLC v. GO FRESH 365, INC. et al
| LOTUS FOODS BOSTON, LLC |
| GO FRESH 365, INC. and LONG DENG |
| 2:2023cv01859 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Marilyn J Horan |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #6 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 12/21/2023. (bjl)
|
|
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM OPINION Upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6), the respective responses and briefs (ECF Nos. 8-10), and for the reasons stated, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss will be granted. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 12/21/2023. (bjl)
|
|
Filing 10
BRIEF in Opposition to #6 Motion to Dismiss filed by LOTUS FOODS BOSTON, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Fuchs, David) Modified text to update links on 11/28/2023. (keh)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION to #6 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, filed by LOTUS FOODS BOSTON, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Fuchs, David)
|
|
Filing 8
Errata re 7 Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss the Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction by LONG DENG, GO FRESH 365, INC.. Reason for Correction: Filing Error For Exhibits. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receivership Docket, #2 Exhibit Bankruptcy Docket) (Pilsner, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by LONG DENG, GO FRESH 365, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Pilsner, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 5
Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate by LOTUS FOODS BOSTON, LLC. (Fuchs, David)
|
|
Filing 4
Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate, declaring citizenship by LONG DENG, GO FRESH 365, INC.. (Pilsner, Matthew)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER AND PROCEDURES ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE available #Here. Signed by Judge Marilyn J. Horan on 10/30/2023. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bjl)
|
|
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #2 Notice of Removal,. ERROR: Parties did not file disclosure statement identifying all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates that have issued shares or debt securities to the public as required pursuant to LR 7.1.A AND identifying CITIZENSHIP pursuant to FRCvP 7.1(a)(2), which took effect on December 1, 2022. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.A and/or FRCvP 7.1(a)(2)). Disclosure Statement due by 11/6/2023. (jkn)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD-23-010988 Copies attached: Plaintiff's Complaint (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7952972), filed by GO FRESH 365, INC., LONG DENG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Records) (jkn)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against LOTUS FOODS BOSTON, LLC (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7952972), filed by GO FRESH 365, INC., LONG DENG. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Records) (jkn) Restricted due to incorrect event. Refiled at #2 . Modified text on 10/27/2023. (jkn)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
