NUNLEY v. TARGET CORPORATION
| RICARDO NUNLEY |
| TARGET CORPORATION |
| 2:2023cv01872 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Nora Barry Fischer |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer filed by TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by 2/1/2024. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 12/28/2023. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdk)
|
| Filing 7 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by TARGET CORPORATION Answer due from TARGET CORPORATION on 2/1/2024. (McCombs, Katelyn) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE: Rule 12(b) Motions. Details more fully stated in Order. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/8/2023. (lyk)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER RE: Motions Practice. Details more fully stated in Order. Signed by Judge Nora Barry Fischer on 11/8/2023. (lyk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (lyk) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by RICARDO NUNLEY. TARGET CORPORATION waiver sent on 11/3/2023, answer due 1/2/2024. (Yurkovich, Erik) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 Complaint. ERROR: Party did not file disclosure statement identifying CITIZENSHIP pursuant to FRCvP 7.1(a)(2), which took effect on December 1, 2022. CORRECTION: Attorney advised to file statement within 7 days under Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > Disclosure Statement (LR 7.1.A and/or FRCvP 7.1(a)(2)). Disclosure Statement due by 11/7/2023. (sdp) |
| CORRECTIVE ENTRY re Quality Control message - Party did not file Disclosure Statement, - DISREGARD THIS message requiring disclosure statement (sdp) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to TARGET CORPORATION (sdp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TARGET CORPORATION (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7956199), filed by RICARDO NUNLEY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NUNLEY v. TARGET CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RICARDO NUNLEY | |
| Represented By: | Erik M. Yurkovich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
