HIPPIETOWN, LLC v. SCHMIDT et al
HIPPIETOWN, LLC |
DET. MICHAEL SCHMIDT, JUDGE GINA R JOYCE, CARLA BOYD, INDIANA SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and INDIANA COUNTY |
2:2023cv01897 |
October 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Mark R Hornak |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Remark: A copy of #2 Memorandum Order and ECF filing receipt filed on 11/3/23 were mailed via regular mail to Joshua Boone 11/3/23. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jad) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM ORDER. For the reasons as set forth herein, For the reasons as set forth herein, this matter is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice as duplicative of the substance of the filing at 23-cv-1895, and any Amended Complaint or other documents shall be filed at 23-cv-1895 only.Any legally-conforming Amended Complaint shall be filed at 23-cv-1895 on or before November 30, 2023. Should such not occur, then the dismissal without prejudice at 23-cv-1895 shall become a dismissal with prejudice without further notice or Order. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 11/3/23. (jad) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by HIPPIETOWN, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (ept) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.