DENISOVA et al v. MAYORKAS et al
| NATALIA DENISOVA and OLEG DENISOV |
| ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, ANTONY BLINKEN, U.S. CONSULATE and MICHELLE YERKIN |
| 2:2023cv01902 |
| November 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Mark R Hornak |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan J. Wilk on behalf of ANTONY BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. CONSULATE, MICHELLE YERKIN. (Wilk, Ryan)
|
|
Filing 9
SUMMONS/Return of Service Returned Executed by NATALIA DENISOVA, OLEG DENISOV. ANTONY BLINKEN served on 11/16/2023, answer due 1/16/2024; ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS served on 11/16/2023, answer due 1/16/2024; U.S. CONSULATE served on 11/16/2023, answer due 1/16/2024; MICHELLE YERKIN served on 11/16/2023, answer due 1/16/2024. (Attachments: #1 Summons Executed, #2 Summons Executed, #3 Summons Executed, #4 Summons Executed, #5 Summons Executed) (Ting, John)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #3 Motion for John Ting to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 11/15/23. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (jad)
|
|
Filing 7
AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice and use either Dial-In No. 1 or Dial-In No. 2, both of which are contained in this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only", so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (jad)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER ON CIVIL MOTION PRACTICE. Signed by Chief Judge Mark R. Hornak on 11/15/23. (jad)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (jad)
|
|
Filing 4
Proposed Order re #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice by OLEG DENISOV, NATALIA DENISOVA. (Ting, John)
|
|
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ERROR: Proposed Order, which is required for all motions in civil cases per Local Rule LCvR7, was not attached. CORRECTION: Attorney is advised to file a proposed order by using the Proposed Order event and linking it to the document in question. (sdp)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for attorney John Ting to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-7974924) by OLEG DENISOV, NATALIA DENISOVA. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit) (Ting, John)
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued as to ANTONY BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. CONSULATE, MICHELLE YERKIN (sdp)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against ANTONY BLINKEN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. CONSULATE, MICHELLE YERKIN (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $402, receipt number APAWDC-7962632), filed by NATALIA DENISOVA, OLEG DENISOV. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (sdp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
