CARVELLI v. JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP
| MICHAEL CARVELLI |
| JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP |
| 2:2023cv02105 |
| December 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Christy Criswell Wiegand |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP. (Miller, Paul) |
| Filing 10 Disclosure Statement identifying Jim Shorkey Group No. 1 as corporate parent or other affiliate by JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP. (Miller, Paul) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Paul Shane Miller on behalf of JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP. (Miller, Paul) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Chloe C. Zidian on behalf of JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP. (Zidian, Chloe) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Sunshine R. Fellows on behalf of JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP. (Fellows, Sunshine) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by MICHAEL CARVELLI. JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP waiver sent on 12/14/2023, answer due 2/12/2024. (Black, John) |
| Filing 5 AT&T SCHEDULING NOTICE FOR ALL TELEPHONIC CONFERENCES. Every Telephonic Conference conducted will be via an AT&T call-in number which requires participants to dial-in and provide an access code. When a Telephonic Conference is scheduled you will be instructed to refer back to this Notice. This document has a security setting of "Case Participants Only," so only those individuals will have access to view the document. (drc) |
Filing 4
ORDER re Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) Motions to Dismiss as more fully stated in said order. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 12/15/2023. (drc)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff shall make service of the notice on all parties. (drc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP (rtm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-8024653), filed by MICHAEL CARVELLI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (rtm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: CARVELLI v. JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHAEL CARVELLI | |
| Represented By: | John E. Black |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: JIM SHORKEY AUTO GROUP | |
| Represented By: | Chloe C. Zidian |
| Represented By: | Sunshine R. Fellows |
| Represented By: | Paul Shane Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
