R.N. et al v. SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff: R.N. and Ms. C.B.
Defendant: SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Case Number: 2:2024cv00070
Filed: January 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Presiding Judge: Kezia O L Taylor
Referring Judge: Kezia OL Taylor
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2024 Filing 9 BRIEF in Support re #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Hoffman, Matthew)
March 11, 2024 Filing 8 Partial MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM re #1 Complaint by SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Hoffman, Matthew). Modified text on 3/11/2024 to add document linkage. (dmh)
March 11, 2024 CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #8 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. ERROR: Document not linked. CORRECTION: Linked to appropriate document. This message is for informational purposes only. (dmh)
February 27, 2024 Filing 7 Joint Consent to Proceed before US Mag. Judge by C.B., R.N. (Weidus, Kristen)
February 14, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER that the parties must meet and confer at least 5 business days prior to the filing of a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) to determine whether it can be avoided. The duty to meet and confer extends to parties appearing pro se. Consistent with the foregoing, motions to dismiss must be accompanied by a certificate of the movant, stating that the moving party has made good faith efforts to confer with the nonmovant(s) to determine whether the identified pleading deficiencies properly may be cured by amendment. The certificate should include when and how the meet and confer took place. The Court will strike any motion to dismiss that does not contain the required certification. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: (1) as soon as is practicable, Plaintiff(s) promptly shall serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s); (2) all counsel and unrepresented parties must read, know and understand the Local Rules of this Court (see web page at: https://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/lrmanual20181101.pdf); and (3) all counsel and unrepresented parties must familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practices and Procedures (see https://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/Taylor_Practices_Procedures.pdf) and they will be held responsible for complying with the same. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kezia O.L. Taylor on 02/14/2024. (jmb)
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that because this case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge, each party must execute and file the form consenting to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge, or selecting the option to have the case randomly assigned to a District Judge, no later than March 4, 2024. The applicable form is available on the Courts website at www.pawd.uscourts.gov in the forms section. THE EVENT USED FOR DOCKETING THIS FORM IS FOUND UNDER OTHER DOCUMENTS, CALLED CONSENT TO TRIAL BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE OR DISTRICT JUDGE. If the parties elect the District Judge Option, Magistrate Judge Kezia O. L. Taylor will continue to manage the case as provided for in Local Rule 72G. Any party who has filed a Consent to Trial by a Magistrate Judge or District Judge form does not need to refile it. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kezia O.L. Taylor on 02/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form) (jmb)
February 6, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher L. Voltz on behalf of SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Voltz, Christopher)
February 6, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew M. Hoffman on behalf of SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT. (Hoffman, Matthew)
January 26, 2024 Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT on 3/19/2024 (dmh)
January 25, 2024 Filing 2 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by R.N., C.B. SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT waiver sent on 1/19/2024, answer due 3/19/2024. (Weidus, Kristen). Modified text on 1/26/2024 to correct date wavier sent and answer due date. (dmh)
January 18, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-8073584), filed by R.N., C.B. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (dmh)
January 18, 2024 Magistrate Judge Kezia O. L. Taylor added. (dmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: R.N. et al v. SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R.N.
Represented By: Kristen C. Weidus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ms. C.B.
Represented By: Kristen C. Weidus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SENECA VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Represented By: Christopher L. Voltz
Represented By: Matthew M. Hoffman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?