GIBSON v. UNITED STATES CONGRESS AND SENATE et al
JEFFREY GIBSON |
UNITED STATES CONGRESS AND SENATE, SUSQUEHANNA TOWNSHIP, U.S. 1952 SCHOOL TAX ACT LAW and J.P. HARRIS |
2:2024cv00179 |
February 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Kezia OL Taylor |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case electronically transferred to District of Pennsylvania Middle. (jd) |
Filing 4 ORDER directing that the Clerk of Court TRANSFER this case FORTHWITH to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Disposition of Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis to be left to the transferee court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kezia O. L. Taylor on February 28, 2024. (kcb) |
Filing 3 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by JEFFREY GIBSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (njd) |
Filing 2 CONSENT to Trial/Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge OR District Judge Option, by JEFFREY GIBSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jd) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by JEFFREY GIBSON. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Letter, #4 Envelope) (jd) |
Magistrate Judge Kezia O.L. Taylor added. (jd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.