GARSTECK v. O'MALLEY
| ANGELA G. GARSTECK |
| MARTIN O'MALLEY |
| 2:2024cv00183 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Alan N Bloch |
| David S Cercone |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Quinn Niblack-Doggett on behalf of MARTIN O'MALLEY. (Niblack-Doggett, Quinn) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to MARTIN O'MALLEY (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons) (bjr) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against MARTIN O'MALLEY (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number 200008437), filed by ANGELA G. GARSTECK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (bjr) |
| Update Answer Deadline: Answer due from MARTIN O'MALLEY on 5/24/2024 (bjr) |
Filing 5
ORDER denying as moot #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Plaintiff having paid the relevant filing fee. The Clerk is directed to file the complaint attached to this motion on the basis of the payment of the fee. Signed by Judge Alan N. Bloch on 3/25/2024. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (dpo)
|
| Filing 4 RECEIPT from Plaintiff for Filing Fee received on 3/22/2024. Receipt No. 200008437 (bjr) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Response/Briefing Schedule re #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis: Plaintiff shall, no later than 3/12/2024, supplement said motion to indicate her entire household income, including that of parents or other family members providing her economic support, and the nature of any such support. Signed by Judge Alan N. Bloch on 2/20/2024. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (dpo)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to Judge Alan N. Bloch for all further proceedings. Judge David S. Cercone no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 2/20/24. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (mwm)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ANGELA G. GARSTECK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons) (bjr) |
| Judge David S. Cercone added. (bjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: GARSTECK v. O'MALLEY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: ANGELA G. GARSTECK | |
| Represented By: | Cindy Stine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY | |
| Represented By: | Quinn Niblack-Doggett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
