CASTRO-MOTA v. BOBBY et al.
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA and SANTOS CASTRO-MOTA |
DAVID BOBBY, COUNSEL MASTER, COUNSEL HAAD and NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER |
2:2024cv00213 |
February 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Cynthia Reed Eddy |
William S Stickman |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Case electronically transferred to Ohio Northern District Court 4:24-cv-00697, filed 04/18/2024. (bjr) Modified text on 4/18/2024. (bjr) |
Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - It is recommended that this prisoner civil rights action be transferred forthwith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. Plaintiff must file written objections, if any, to this Report and Recommendation by March 22, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on 3/4/2024. (bsc) |
Judge William S. Stickman presiding and Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy referred. (bjr) |
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy no longer presiding in case. (bjr) |
Filing 1 Remark: Complaint lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bjr) |
Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy added. (bjr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.