GUIDAS v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
RONALD GUIDAS |
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION |
2:2024cv00305 |
March 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
William S Stickman |
Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING #16 Motion to Stay Briefing on #10 Motion to Dismiss. The briefing deadlines on the pending motion to dismiss are terminated. A new briefing schedule will issue upon the resolution of the motion to remand, if appropriate. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 04/25/24. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (eca) |
Filing 16 MOTION TO STAY BRIEFING OF DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS re #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION by RONALD GUIDAS. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Santillo, R.) |
Filing 15 REPLY BRIEF re #7 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by RONALD GUIDAS. (Santillo, R.) |
Filing 14 Errata re #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION. Reason for Correction: Corrected Document. (Presley, Marla) |
Filing 13 Errata re #12 Brief in Opposition to Motion to Remand by UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION. Reason for Correction: Corrected Document. (Presley, Marla) |
Filing 12 BRIEF in Opposition re #7 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION. (Presley, Marla) Document removed from public view and refiled as an Errata at #13 Modified text on 4/22/2024. (njd) |
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Response to #10 Motion to Dismiss due by 5/6/2024; Reply due by 5/13/2024. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 04/15/24. (eca) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. ERROR: re Attachment 1 Memorandum in Support should have been filed as a separate document. CORRECTION: Attorney advised in future that documents of that nature are to be filed as separate documents. Clerk of Court docketed Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. This message is for informational purposes only. (njd) |
Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Presley, Marla) Link added to Errata at #14 Modified text on 4/22/2024. (njd) |
CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #7 Motion to Remand to State Court, #8 Brief in Support of Motion. ERROR: Attorney signature missing required information. CORRECTION: Attorney directed to comply with requirements of LCvR 5.2(B) in all future filings. This message is for informational purposes only. (dmh) |
Filing 9 ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Response to #7 Motion to Remand to State Court due by 4/15/2024; Reply due by 4/22/2024. Page limitations outlined herein. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 03/22/24. (eca) |
Filing 8 BRIEF in Support re #7 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by RONALD GUIDAS. (Santillo, R.) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court by RONALD GUIDAS. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Santillo, R.) |
Filing 6 ORDER approving #5 Stipulation. An answer or responsive pleading due by 04/12/2024. Signed by Judge William S. Stickman on 03/12/2024. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (rgm) |
Filing 5 Stipulation for Extension of Time to Answer by UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION Answer due from UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION on 4/12/2024. (Bunting, Laura) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Marla N. Presley on behalf of UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION. (Presley, Marla) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by R. Andrew Santillo on behalf of RONALD GUIDAS. (Santillo, R.) |
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate by UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION. (Bunting, Laura) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Allegheny County, case number GD-24-1257 (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-8149892), filed by UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A State Court Docket, Original Complaint, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C Notice of Filing) (elt) |
Judge William S. Stickman added. (elt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: GUIDAS v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RONALD GUIDAS | |
Represented By: | G. Timothy Conboy |
Represented By: | Peter Winebrake |
Represented By: | R. Andrew Santillo |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION | |
Represented By: | Laura C. Bunting |
Represented By: | Marla N. Presley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.