EGGLESTON v. WAHL et al
| LAWRENCE EGGLESTON |
| MARK WAHL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY |
| 2:2024cv00306 |
| March 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM OPINION - the Petition filed by LAWRENCE EGGLESTON was received without the filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court may dismiss the petition prior to service if it plainly appears that Eggleston is not en titled to habeas relief. That is the case here because the instant petition is a second or successive petition and Eggleston does not assert that he has received from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit an order authorizing this Court to consider it, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). Accordingly, the instant petition will be summarily dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and a certificate of appealability will be denied. Signed by Judge Arthur J. Schwab on 3/20/2024. (bsc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
