BOOZER v. GOURLEY et al
LEE BOOZER |
MICHAEL GOURLEY and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA |
2:2024cv00463 |
March 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
Kezia OL Taylor |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER construing #1 Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Habeas Corpus Petition as a Motion to Stay and granting same. Consideration of the Petition is STAYED pending the conclusion of Petitioner's state court proceedings. The Clerk of Court is directed to administratively CLOSE this case. In the event Petitioner does not get the relief he seeks in state court, he shall file a motion to lift the stay and reopen this case within thirty (30) days of the conclusion of the state court proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kezia O. L. Taylor on April 3, 2024. (kcb) |
Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $5, receipt number 200008569), filed by LEE BOOZER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cww) |
Filing 3 Filing fee: $5, receipt number 200008569 (bjr) |
Filing 2 Remark: Habeas Petition lodged without Motion for In Forma Pauperis or payment of filing fee (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (bjr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for extension of time to file a habeas corpus petition by LEE BOOZER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (jkn) |
Magistrate Judge Kezia O.L. Taylor added. (jkn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.