SPRUCE STREET PROPERTIES LTD et al v. CARLYLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION et al
| SPRUCE STREET PROPERTIES LTD, DAVID W. BISHOFF, E.V. BISHOFF, COMPANY and DUQUESNE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP |
| CARLYLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ESQUIRE DAVID M. BELCZYK, ESQUIRE DAVID I. KELCH, ESQUIRE DAVID WOLF, ESQUIRE SCOTT HARE, ESQUIRE NICHOLAS MILLER and ESQUIRE GEORGE R. FARNETH, II |
| 2:2024cv00544 |
| April 11, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Errata re #1 COMPLAINT, by DAVID W. BISHOFF, DUQUESNE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, E.V. BISHOFF, COMPANY, SPRUCE STREET PROPERTIES LTD. Reason for Correction: omitted attorney information, incorrect action choice on cover sheet. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Haines, Clifford) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CARLYLE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, DAVID M. BELCZYK, DAVID I. KELCH, DAVID WOLF, SCOTT HARE, NICHOLAS MILLER, GEORGE R. FARNETH, II (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-8211012), filed by E.V. BISHOFF, COMPANY, DAVID W. BISHOFF, DUQUESNE GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, SPRUCE STREET PROPERTIES LTD. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons) (Haines, Clifford) Modified text on 4/11/2024. (kss) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
