ABNER et al v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. et al
| MICHAEL ABNER, JAMES ABRAMS, LISA ADAMS and LATASHA ABRAMS |
| FEDEX CORPORATION and FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. |
| 2:2024cv01129 |
| August 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Robert J Colville |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #17 Amended Complaint. ERROR: Caption of document does not match caption and of case. CORRECTION: Attorney is directed to file an Errata adding all PLAINTIFFS names to the case. (jd) |
| Filing 17 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., filed by MICHAEL ABNER. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) |
Filing 16
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Jessica G. Scott to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 8/19/24. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cjo)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for attorney Jessica G. Scott to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-8414822) by FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order) (Scott, Jessica) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Shanicka Kennedy on behalf of FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (Kennedy, Shanicka) |
| Filing 13 Disclosure Statement identifying FedEx Corporation as corporate parent or other affiliate by FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (McHugh, Joseph) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph P. McHugh on behalf of FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.. (McHugh, Joseph) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #5 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #6 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice,. ERROR: Caption and/or Case number of document does not match caption and/or case number of case. CORRECTION: Attorney is directed to ADD ALL PLAINTIFFS during next filing. When filer i s at the screen to select filer, use the button to "NEW FILER" to add each missing Plaintiff. (jd) (jd) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Matthew Carrieri to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 8/14/24. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cjo)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Shannon Liss-Riordan to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 8/14/24. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cjo)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Jeremy Abay to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 8/14/24. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cjo)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for attorney Matthew Carrieri to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-8406952) by MICHAEL ABNER. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Carrieri, Matthew) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Harold Lichten to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 8/14/24. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cjo)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for attorney Shannon Liss-Riordan to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-8406860) by MICHAEL ABNER. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for attorney Jeremy Abay to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-8406845) by MICHAEL ABNER. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Abay, Jeremy) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for attorney Harold Lichten to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-8406797) by MICHAEL ABNER. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Lichten, Harold) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER re 12(b) Motions. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 8/7/24. (cjo)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE that instant civil action has been designated for placement into the United States District Court's Alternative Dispute Resolution program. Parties are directed to fully complete the required 26(f) report, which includes the stipulation of selecting an ADR process. Counsel for plaintiff (or in the case of a removal action, counsel for removing defendant) shall make service of the notice on all parties. (cjo) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 COMPLAINT ERROR: Caption and/or Case number of document does not match caption and/or case number of case. CORRECTION: Attorney is directed to ADD ALL PLAINTIFFS during next filing. When filer is at the screen to select filer, use the button to "NEW FILER" to add each missing Plaintiff. (jd) |
| Judge Robert J. Colville added. (jd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FEDEX CORPORATION, FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-8395288), filed by MICHAEL ABNER. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Schalman-Bergen, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
