BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' MEDICAL PLAN v. POWLEY et al
| Board of Trustees of Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Medical Plan |
| Hannah Powley and Robert Powley |
| 2:2024cv01421 |
| October 9, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| J Nicholas Ranjan |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Errata re Quality Control message - Attorney Signature Deficient, #1 COMPLAINT, by Board of Trustees of Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Medical Plan. Reason for Correction: adding Bar ID and email to signature. (Charles, Elizabeth) |
| CLERK'S OFFICE QUALITY CONTROL MESSAGE re #1 COMPLAINT. ERROR: Attorney signature missing required information, specifically the bar ID number and the email address. CORRECTION: Attorney directed to comply with requirements of LCvR 5.2(B) and refile the document using the Errata event. (ept) |
| Judge J. Nicholas Ranjan added. (keh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hannah Powley, Robert Powley (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-8501825), filed by Board of Trustees of Greater Pennsylvania Carpenters' Medical Plan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Charles, Elizabeth) Document removed from public view and refiled at #2 . Modified text on 10/11/2024. (tla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
