FOSHANSHIHUITUOLIDIANCHI CO., LTD. et al v. Shenzhen Zhanpusida Technology Co., Ltd.
| FOSHANSHIHUITUOLIDIANCHI CO., LTD. doing business as HiTop Jump Starter and MOZHENKEJISHENZHENYOUXIANGONGSI doing business as Uncle Smiths Garage |
| Shenzhen Zhanpusida Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 2:2026cv00313 |
| February 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Robert J Colville |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Zheng Gong to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Robert J. Colville on 3/2/26. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (cjo)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER transferring this case to the Honorable Robert J. Colville as related to cases pending before him. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 2/24/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bjw)
|
| Filing 4 PATENT/TRADEMARK DOCUMENTS ISSUED. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit 1) (bjr) |
| Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand added. (bjr) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for attorney Zheng Gong to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-9379958) by FOSHANSHIHUITUOLIDIANCHI CO., LTD., MOZHENKEJISHENZHENYOUXIANGONGSI. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit GONG, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Gong, Zheng) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet re #1 COMPLAINT, by FOSHANSHIHUITUOLIDIANCHI CO., LTD., MOZHENKEJISHENZHENYOUXIANGONGSI. (Gong, Zheng) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shenzhen Zhanpusida Technology Co., Ltd. (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-9379910), filed by MOZHENKEJISHENZHENYOUXIANGONGSI, FOSHANSHIHUITUOLIDIANCHI CO., LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Gong, Zheng) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: FOSHANSHIHUITUOLIDIANCHI CO., LTD. et al v. Shenzhen Zhanpusida Technology Co., Ltd. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: FOSHANSHIHUITUOLIDIANCHI CO., LTD. doing business as HiTop Jump Starter | |
| Represented By: | Zheng Gong |
| Represented By: | Zheng Gong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MOZHENKEJISHENZHENYOUXIANGONGSI doing business as Uncle Smiths Garage | |
| Represented By: | Zheng Gong |
| Represented By: | Zheng Gong |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Shenzhen Zhanpusida Technology Co., Ltd. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
