WATSON v. BEAVER COUNTY, PA et al
| ERIC WATSON |
| BEAVER COUNTY, PA, UPMC-WPIC, TINA WATTS, Gerard Mike, KRISTEN HOUSER and DR. VAL ARKOOSH |
| 2:2026cv00501 |
| March 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Mark R Hornak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Remark: On this date, a copy of #5 was mailed to the following: Eric Watson, 313 Park Ave., Beaver Falls, PA 15010. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb) |
| Filing 6 Remark: On this date, the following documents were delivered to the USMS by the Courts Deputy: #4 Complaint; notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of summons, and waiver, and #5 Order. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb) |
Filing 5
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the United States Marshal is directed to mail a copy of the Complaint, notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of summons, and waiver, and this order to Defendant(s) as directed by the Plaintiff, costs to be advanced by the United States of America. The Defendant(s) are requested to waive service pursuant to Rule 4(d). Should such waiver of service not occur within the required time period, the Marshal shall proceed with personal service as required by law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED and Plaintiff is advised that no Defendant is required to respond to the complaint until he has accepted a copy of the complaint from the United States Marshal and waived service or has been served. Therefore, a motion for default cannot properly be filed unless the Defendant has failed to file an answer, a motion to dismiss, or a motion for additional time to respond, within sixty (60) days after the Marshal's notice has been mailed, if service is waived pursuant to the notice, or twenty-one (21) days after being served. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 4/7/26. (bdb)
|
| Filing 3 Remark: On this date, a copy of ECF No. 2 was mailed to the following: ERIC WATSON, 313 Park Ave., Beaver Falls, PA 15010. Text-only entry. No PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against VAL ARKOOSH, BEAVER COUNTY, PA, KRISTEN HOUSER, Gerard Mike, UPMC-WPIC, TINA WATTS, filed by ERIC WATSON. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N) (keh) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Mark R. Hornak on 3/29/26. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (bdb)
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by ERIC WATSON. (Attachments: #1 Complaint lodged pending disposition of IFP Motion, #2 Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G, #10 Exhibit H, #11 Exhibit I, #12 Exhibit J, #13 Exhibit K, #14 Exhibit L, #15 Exhibit M, #16 Exhibit N, #17 Civil Cover Sheet, #18 Envelope) (keh) |
| Judge Mark R. Hornak added. (keh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
