SHELLEY v. SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL, et al
| 3:2004cv00001 |
| January 6, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
92
MEMORANDUM OPINION The settlement proceeds of $8,420.42 were deposited with the clerk of court on 2/18/15 88 . Those proceeds, plus accrued interest, have been maintained by the clerk of court ever since that date. As confirmed by his response to the show cause order, Shelley continues to disclaim the settlement proceeds. Congress provided that under these circumstances, unclaimed money should be transferred to the Treasury. Details more fully stated in the order. Signed by Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 7/15/21. (cjo)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER granting 76 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement; adopting Report and Recommendations re 79 Report and Recommendation as the Opinion of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 67 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 67.2 of this Court, defendant is permitted and hereby ordered to deposit money into the Registry of the Court in the amount of $8,420.42; as soon as the business of the office allows, the Clerk will deposit the money into an interest bearing account, the Court Registry Investment System ("CRIS"), administered by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts under 28 U.S.C. 2045. This shall be the only investment mechanism authorized. The custodian, CRI S, is authorized and directed by this Order to deduct the investment services fee for the management of investments and the registry fee, set by the Judicial Conference, for maintaining accounts deposited with the Court. Upon execution of a full and final release by the plaintiff and the filing of that release with the Clerk, the Clerk shall pay $3,420.42 to the Somerset County Office of Costs and Fines, and the balance after deduction of the investment services fee to the plaintiff in compliance with Local Civil Rule 67.3. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti on 1/21/2014. (smc )
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 21 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by TIMOTHY MAPES. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim that Defendant was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical need for dental care and DENIED as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim that Defendant was deliberately indifferent to the threat that a fellow inmate would assault him. Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendant an d against Plaintiff as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim that Defendant was deliberately indifferent to his serious medical need for dental care. The 43 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Pesto, filed on August 27, 2008, is ado pted as the Opinion of the Court, along with the reasons set forth herein. The parties shall file with the Court whether they consent to trial before the Magistrate Judge no later than October 9, 2008. Signed by Judge Maurice B. Cohill on 9/25/2008. (sjs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: SHELLEY v. SOMERSET COUNTY JAIL, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
