HOLBROOK et al v. WOODHAM et al

HOLBROOK et al v. WOODHAM et al

Case Number:	3:2005cv00304
Filed:	July 14, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Johnstown Office
Presiding Judge:	Kim R. Gibson
Nature of Suit:	P.I.: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 13, 2009	Filing 209 OPINION AND ORDER - exercising its discretion to amend and correct its September 30 order, and in accordance with the above opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bruce & Merrilees' Motion to Dismiss Third Party Complaint (Doc. No. 146 ) is granted in full, and all remaining claims against Bruce & Merrilees for contribution, as raised in Docs. No. 109 and 111 , are hereby dismissed, and as more fully stated in said Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 2/13/2009. (dlg)
September 30, 2008	Filing 191 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting 118 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 122 Motion for Summary Judgment - New Enterprise Stone and Lime Inc.'s Motion is Granted as to Plaintiff's claim for punitive da mages but Denied in all other regards; granting in part and denying in part 146 Motion to Dismiss - Granted as to New Enterprise and Woodham's claims for Bruce and Merrilees' direct and sole liability to Plaintiff and accordingly, paragra phs 44, 45, 50, and 51 are stricken from New Enterprise and Woodham's Third Party Complaint and the phrases "in the alternative" and "and/or jointly or severally liable to Plaintiff" are stricken from paragraphs 46 and 52 of both Third Party Complaints. To the extent Bruce and Merrilees' Motion addresses New Enterprise and Woodham's claims for contribution, the Motion is Denied, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/30/2008. (dlg)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 13, 2009

Filing 209 OPINION AND ORDER - exercising its discretion to amend and correct its September 30 order, and in accordance with the above opinion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Bruce & Merrilees' Motion to Dismiss Third Party Complaint (Doc. No. 146 ) is granted in full, and all remaining claims against Bruce & Merrilees for contribution, as raised in Docs. No. 109 and 111 , are hereby dismissed, and as more fully stated in said Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 2/13/2009. (dlg)

September 30, 2008

Filing 191 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting 118 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 122 Motion for Summary Judgment - New Enterprise Stone and Lime Inc.'s Motion is Granted as to Plaintiff's claim for punitive da mages but Denied in all other regards; granting in part and denying in part 146 Motion to Dismiss - Granted as to New Enterprise and Woodham's claims for Bruce and Merrilees' direct and sole liability to Plaintiff and accordingly, paragra phs 44, 45, 50, and 51 are stricken from New Enterprise and Woodham's Third Party Complaint and the phrases "in the alternative" and "and/or jointly or severally liable to Plaintiff" are stricken from paragraphs 46 and 52 of both Third Party Complaints. To the extent Bruce and Merrilees' Motion addresses New Enterprise and Woodham's claims for contribution, the Motion is Denied, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 9/30/2008. (dlg)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HOLBROOK et al v. WOODHAM et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?