CEROME v. MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER/CORNELL COMPANIES, INC. et al
| CARLO ELISCA CEROME |
| C. ROHRBACKER, OFFICER CRIBB, W. JONES, M. MILLWARD, OFFICER MANN and MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER/CORNELL COMPANIES, INC. |
| 3:2007cv00077 |
| April 4, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania |
| Johnstown Office |
| Clearfield |
| Kim R. Gibson |
| Keith A. Pesto |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 23 Motion to Dismiss; adopting 27 Report and Recommendation as the opinion of the Court; denying 28 Motion for Extension of Time. Proof of exhaustion rests on historical facts already in the record: no additional law library time will change their significance. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed, and as more fully stated in said Memorandum Order. Signed by Judge Kim R. Gibson on 3/27/2009. (dlg)
|
|
Filing
27
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 23 MOTION to Dismiss re 4 Complaint filed by OFFICER CRIBB, C. ROHRBACKER, OFFICER MANN, MOSHANNON VALLEY CORRECTIONAL CENTER/CORNELL COMPANIES, INC., W. JONES, M. MILLWARD, recommending that the motion should be granted for lack of exhaustion of administrative remedies; Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2009. Signed by Judge Keith A. Pesto on 3/5/09. (plp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
